Evaluating Plasticizer Loss
In PVC Membranes
Plasticizer loss is shown to be minimal in either moist or exposed environments. Membrane usefulness is not affected by the loss that does occur.
By Doug Burwell, PE
Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and PVC alloys have been used extensively for many years for containment. In fact, a number of sites decades old still have functional PVC liners. Over the past few years, however, concerns have arisen over these liners and the loss of plasticizer under exposed and unexposed or buried conditions.
PVC liner production involves mixing or blending PVC resin,
stabilizers,
plasticizers and pigments. The plasticizer softens the polymer to make
it pliable. When plasticizer is blended with the PVC, a portion of it
forms an intimate bond with the PVC, while the remainder is captured
in the polymer matrix.
The rate of loss of plasticizer depends on
plasticizer type, temperature, sheet thickness and exposure time. The
actual mechanism behind this loss is evaporation of plasticizer from
the surface of the membrane. Therefore, for highly plasticized PVC, as
in this case, the rate of plasticizer loss is dependent on the surface
area. Figure (1) shows percent loss is directly proportional to time
for a range of thicknesses and this loss varies logarithmically with
temperature. Figure (2) shows loss varies inversely with thickness up
to approximately 50 percent of plasticizer loss. Loss, therefore, can
be expressed by the equation:
W = Aebt
(1)
where:
W is the weight loss,
A is a constant depending on time and film thickness,
T is temperature,
b is the slope of the line.
Equation (1) can be expanded to give total weight loss of a
vinyl sheet if one set of conditions is known. Equation 2 gives the
estimated weight loss if an initial set is known.
|
W2 = W1 * |
T2d1 |
K T2 –T1 (2) |
|
T1d2 |
where W, t, d, and T are weight loss, exposure time, sheet thickness and temperature (°C), respectively.
If the maximum weight loss before detrimental physical
effects occur is set
arbitrarily at 10 percent, which is 25 percent to 33 percent of total
plasticizer
loss, and it is recognized most PVC geomembranes specify a maximum
volatile loss between 0.9 percent and 0.3 percent according to ASTM
1203A (70°C, 24 hours), a maximum exposure time can be developed.
For example consider the worst case of 0.9 percent loss in
24 hours at 70°C, W1 = 0.009, t1 = 24
hours, T1 = 70°C, and d1= d2.
If W2 is set at 0.100 or 10 percent loss, and
T2 is set at a maximum temperature of 30°C,
substituting
these values into Equation 2 yields the following result:
|
0.100 = 0.009 * |
T2 |
*1.10(30 – 70) |
(3) |
|
24 |
Solving for t2 gives 12069 hours or 502 days. For the minimum of 0.3 percent maximum volatility, 1 0 percent weight loss does not occur until 1508 days. If a temperature of 20°C is used, the time to 10 percent weight loss increases to 3.5 years at 0.9 percent volatility and increases to 10.7 years at 0.3 percent volatility.
This method of calculating the maximum exposure time of a
membrane is
extremely conservative for two reasons. The first reason is the use of
maximum
volatility, since much of what is lost is the lubricant used for
processing. Also, the more volatile part of the plasticizer will flash
off at this time. Secondly, this equation assumes a temperature of
30°C is maintained constantly, where in fact it is maintained only for
a short time during mid-day. The conservative values generated from
this equation have been confirmed at Florida test sites where samples
of PVC exposed to average maximums of more than 33°C in August still
retained most of their plasticizer after six years.
Even if these conservative values are accepted as fact, it
is highly unlikely a problem would develop in the field due to
plasticizer loss before the membrane
is installed. It would take more than a year at 30°C temperatures to
lose 10 percent of the plasticizer weight.
It is unlikely a problem would develop in
the field
due to plasticizer loss before the membrane is installed.
Once the membrane is buried, a different set of conditions
exists. First, the
temperature is much lower and there is not a free amount of air
present, which makes loss of plasticizer due to volatility negligible.
On the other hand, moisture is present, which will cause some leaching
of plasticizer.
Plasticizer is not soluble in water, therefore the
mechanism is not simply
extraction. The water diffuses into the vinyl matrix and combines with
the plasticizer, and a water-plasticizer blend exudes. Plasticizers
vary markedly in their sensitivity to water absorption, and ones that
are not susceptible to this phenomenon should be selected. In most
cases, the water extraction (ASTM D3083A) is around (-0.2) percent,
which indicates some water has diffused into the PVC but little
exudation has occurred.
Two-year water immersion tests on PVC membranes have been conducted by the National Sanitation Foundation (NSF) at both 23°C and 50°C. Percent weight change in all cases is less than 3 percent.
When tested at 23°C, maximum weight change is less than 2
percent. Modulus at 100 percent elongation at 23°C and 50°C and
elongation at break
(ASTM D412 die C) show no great loss of physical properties resulting
from
immersion in water, even at elevated temperatures. See Table 1, If
there were a substantial loss of plasticizer, the change in physical
properties would be larger than is seen here. Therefore, it can be
concluded plasticizer loss due to water leaching is insignificant for
PVC membranes.
Doug Burwell, PE is a chemical engineer with Canadian General Tower (CGT) in Cambridge, Ontario. The company is a member of the PVC geomembrane Institute.
Reprinted from POLLUTION ENGINEERING © February 1991 by CAHNERS PUBLISHING COMPANY
|
TABLE 1 PLASTICIZED PVC IMMERSED IN 100% WATER |
|||||||||||
|
Days Immersed |
Percent Weight Change |
Percent Retention SMOD M |
Percent Retention SMOD T |
Percent Retention EAB M |
Percent Retention EAB T |
||||||
|
WATER 100% 50ºC |
|||||||||||
|
1 |
0.8 |
92 |
95 |
92 |
97 |
||||||
|
7 |
1.2 |
84 |
87 |
120 |
117 |
||||||
|
14 |
1.7 |
108 |
108 |
101 |
90 |
||||||
|
28 |
1.7 |
87 |
94 |
99 |
105 |
||||||
|
28 |
2.1 |
* |
* |
* |
* |
||||||
|
56 |
1.4 |
97 |
98 |
94 |
100 |
||||||
|
133 |
2.3 |
* |
* |
* |
* |
||||||
|
254 |
2.7 |
* |
* |
* |
* |
||||||
|
370 |
2.5 |
* |
* |
* |
* |
||||||
|
503 |
2.6 |
* |
* |
* |
* |
||||||
|
622 |
2.6 |
* |
* |
* |
* |
||||||
|
735 |
2.5 |
98 |
* |
112 |
* |
||||||
|
WATER 100% 23ºC |
|||||||||||
|
1 |
0.1 |
94 |
96 |
105 |
101 |
||||||
|
1 |
0.3 |
95 |
96 |
107 |
113 |
||||||
|
1 |
* |
93 |
99 |
111 |
104 |
||||||
|
7 |
0.4 |
85 |
84 |
108 |
114 |
||||||
|
7 |
0.6 |
84 |
88 |
104 |
111 |
||||||
|
7 |
0.5 |
85 |
85 |
100 |
115 |
||||||
|
14 |
0.8 |
94 |
103 |
89 |
100 |
||||||
|
14 |
0.8 |
90 |
91 |
100 |
106 |
||||||
|
14 |
0.9 |
89 |
92 |
102 |
107 |
||||||
|
28 |
0.7 |
93 |
95 |
105 |
110 |
||||||
|
28 |
1.0 |
* |
* |
* |
* |
||||||
|
28 |
0.9 |
93 |
85 |
103 |
116 |
||||||
|
28 |
0.8 |
93 |
87 |
118 |
121 |
||||||
|
56 |
1.1 |
109 |
112 |
87 |
91 |
||||||
|
56 |
0.9 |
100 |
102 |
94 |
93 |
||||||
|
56 |
0.8 |
96 |
99 |
102 |
92 |
||||||
|
132 |
1.5 |
* |
* |
* |
* |
||||||
|
247 |
0.8 |
* |
* |
* |
* |
||||||
|
370 |
1.8 |
* |
* |
* |
* |
||||||
|
503 |
1.4 |
* |
* |
* |
* |
||||||
|
622 |
1.2 |
* |
* |
* |
* |
||||||
|
737 |
0.7 |
100 |
* |
107 |
* |
||||||
| From "development of Chemical Compatibility Requirements For Assessing Flexible Membrane Liners" | |||||||||||







.jpg)